|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
About |
News |
Architecture |
Metadata |
Brokerage |
Partners |
Groups |
Contacts |
|
| Getting Educational Systems Talking Across Leading-Edge Technologies | ||||||||
Metadata is the "buzz" word in today’s multimedia industry, commonly described as being "Data about data". In other words, metadata provides a means by which the multimedia’s semantics can be described in a structured fashion for use by many varied applications or services. Metadata created solely for use by a single application or toolset goes against all the "hype" surrounding its use ie. Searchability, Extensibility, Re-usability, Scalability. What’s required is a template or standard that everyone conforms to for the exchange and use of media. But even this may not be enough, especially for interoperability issues eg. Spoken language independency
During the past few years a number of projects have investigated managing information retrieval and using metadata for education and training. Amongst these are the standardisation activities of the Instructional Management System (IMS) project
IMS on which the GESTALT Metadata requirements are based, together with extensions specific to the GESTALT environment, can be found in the Section 2.3.1. of the public deliverable "Gestalt Joint Requirements Specification (D0201)"
The two major players in the educational metadata arena, IMS and ARIADNE( http://ariadne.unil.ch/metadata/april98.html ), have declared their support of the IEEE LOM ( http://www.manta.ieee.org/p1484/ltscdocs/wgc/LOMdoc2_5a.doc ) . The IEEE LOM groups its metadata structures into the following 8 categories
The metadata elements defined in each of the categories are defined using
Metadata elements can be
In some instances, the value of a data element may consist of a list of values, rather than a single value. This list can be ordered or unordered. Vocabularies can be Restricted to the list of values specified or Open, in which case the list represents suggested best practice values but others are acceptable.
GESTALT will follow this lead to derive its own structure. However, making the analysis between the three of them highlighted some interesting facts. A summary table of differences is shown below. The full analysis, using IEEE LOM as the analysis base, is available as a Microsoft® Powerpoint® presentation. Left-click on the following link to launch the presentation, or right-click to download it (the latter is advised due to the small text used in the presentation). IEEEMappings.ppt.
|
Comparison |
IEEE LOM V2.5 |
IMS V1.0 |
ARIADNE V2.0 |
|
8 |
9 |
7 |
|
101 |
90 |
40 |
|
33 |
31 |
22 |
|
- |
20 |
3 |
|
- |
7 |
9 |
|
- |
6 |
21 |
|
- |
55 |
5 |
|
- |
21 |
30 |
|
- |
25 |
66 |
Based upon the IEEE LOM and requirements for the GESTALT resource discovery, learning environment and delivery designs, the following additions or changes have been identified. They can be grouped into four types
During the course of the project a number of future areas will be tracked and, if relevant, involve participation with other interested parties. These include
|
|
© Fretwell Downing Education, 1999. |
Updated 26-APR-1999 |
Send comments or questions to kriley@fdgroup.co.uk |